Protected by What They Protest
Having a friend that died in Iraq this site makes me sick. all you black-hats and white-hats shut this site down. For just moral reasons and because they protested the funerals.
I ran an editorial about this group before but since this story has made it to the front page of Digg I decided to give it another go. This whole situation presents a major moral dilemma. Although I don’t hate this group’s message and would even consider it worthwhile to spend time in jail to physically assault the heads of this organization, they have the right to spread their message. It’s so lame, I mean fundamentally they are protesting their right to protest and that boggles my mind. This leads me to the digg story, should someone hack their site? I wish I had an answer to that, but I don’t. How could I say yes and not become a total hypocrite to my own stance on censorship. No, the Internet is great because anyone who has anything to say can. Weather it is hate groups or people with no lives who write lame rants ( Example). There is a sliver lining in situations like this though; 1.Karma. And 2. Bandwidth is not free.
